Una familia de experimentos para analizar las preferencias de los usuarios en el diseño de IGUs a partir de modelos BPMN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65234/interaccion.22Palabras clave:
Modelo BPMN, IGUs, Estudio Empírico, Atractividad, Correctitud, UsabilidadResumen
Contexto: Diseñar las Interfaces Gráficas de usuario (IGUs) a partir de la Notación de Modelos de Proceso de Negocio (BPMN) no es trivial, hay gran variedad de alternativas gráficas para una misma primitiva BPMN. Objetivo: Una de las contribuciones es la elaboración de recomendaciones para seleccionar las alternativas gráficas a partir de primitivas BPMN que optimizan la usabilidad. Otra es la ejecución de una familia de experimentos para analizar las preferencias de los sujetos en el diseño de IGUs a partir de BPMN y ver si estas preferencias coinciden con nuestras recomendaciones. Método: Las recomendaciones de usabilidad fueron extraídas de propuestas anteriores. La familia de experimentos consiste en 2 réplicas de 43 y 47 sujetos donde se estudia la Atractividad (porcentaje de sujetos que prefieren cada alternativa de diseño) y la Correctitud (porcentaje de sujetos cuya preferencia coincide con la recomendación que proponemos). Resultados: La Atractividad muestra que 10 alternativas (de 14) de diseño de IGUs superaron el 50% de los votos de los sujetos. La Correctitud muestra que 8 alternativas de diseño (de 14) coinciden con nuestras alternativas recomendadas. Conclusiones: Las alternativas con mejor Atractividad y Correctitud son report, datagrid, combobox, timer, hyperlink, Textbox, checkbox y buttons
Referencias
Azuma, M. (2008). Iso/iec cd 25010: Software engineering–software product quality requirements and evaluation (square)–software and quality in use models. ISO/IEC JTC1/SC7, CANADA.
BPMN. (2013). Business Process Modeling Notation. 2020, from http://www.bpmn.org
Brambilla, M., Fraternali, P., & Vaca, C. (2011). BPMN and design patterns for engineering social BPM solutions. Paper presented at the International Conference on Business Process Management. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28108-2_22
Dahl, Y., & Svendsen, R.-M. (2011). End-user composition interfaces for smart environments: A preliminary study of usability factors. Paper presented at the International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21708-1_14
Design, M. (2018). Design. from https://material.io/design/
Design, U. S. W. (2018). UI Components. from https://designsystem.digital.gov/components/
Diaz, E., Panach, J. I., Rueda, S., & Pastor, O. (2018a). Generación de Interfaces de Usuario a partir de Modelos BPMN con Estereotipos. Paper presented at the Jornada de la Sociedad de Ingeniería de Software y Tecnologías de Desarrollo de Software (SISTEDES).
Diaz, E., Panach, J. I., Rueda, S., & Pastor, O. (2018b, 29-31 May 2018). Towards a method to generate GUI prototypes from BPMN. Paper presented at the 2018 12th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/RCIS.2018.8406675
Fiori, S. (2018). Fiori Design Guidelines. from https://experience.sap.com/fiori-design-web/
Galitz, W. O. (2007). The essential guide to user interface design: an introduction to GUI design principles and techniques: John Wiley & Sons.
Han, L., Zhao, W., & Yang, J. (2016). An approach towards user interface derivation from business process model. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 602, 19-28. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-1019-4_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1019-4_2
Hartmann, J., Sutcliffe, A., & De Angeli, A. (2007). Investigating attractiveness in web user interfaces. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240687
Hassenzahl, M., Burmester, M., & Koller, F. (2003). AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität Mensch & computer 2003 (pp. 187-196): Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80058-9_19
IEEE. (2010). Systems and software engineering -- Vocabulary.
Iso/iec. (2005). ISO/IEC 25000 - Software engineering - Software product Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) - Guide to SQuaRE. doi: citeulike-article-id:10949862
Johnson, J. (2008). Common user interface design don'ts and Dos: Morgan Kaufmann.
Kitchenham, B., & Pfleeger, S. L. (2002). Principles of survey research part 4: questionnaire evaluation. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 27(3), 20-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/638574.638580
Kous, K., Pušnik, M., Heričko, M., & Polančič, G. (2020). Usability evaluation of a library website with different end user groups. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 52(1), 75-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000618773133
Lee, Z. C., & Yurchisin, J. (2011). The impact of website attractiveness, consumer-website identification, and website trustworthiness on purchase intention. International Journal of Electronic Customer Relationship Management, 5(3-4), 272-287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJECRM.2011.044692
Microsoft, M. (2018). Common UI Controls and Text Guidelines
Molich, R., Jeffries, R., & Dumas, J. S. (2007). Making usability recommendations useful and usable. Journal of Usability Studies, 2(4), 162-179.
Osada, K., Muke, P. Z., Piwowarczyk, M., Telec, Z., & Trawiński, B. (2020). Comparative Usability Analysis of Selected Data Entry Methods for Web Systems. Cybernetics and Systems, 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01969722.2019.1705552
Park, K., Jeong, M., & Kim, K. (2018). Usability evaluation of menu interfaces for smartwatches. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 1-10.
Payne, J. W., Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker: Cambridge university press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173933
Schrepp, M., Held, T., & Laugwitz, B. (2006). The influence of hedonic quality on the attractiveness of user interfaces of business management software. Interacting with Computers, 18(5), 1055-1069. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2006.01.002
Sousa, K., Mendonça, H., & Vanderdonckt, J. (2007). User Interface Derivation from Business Processes: A Model-Driven Approach for Organizational Engineering. Paper presented at the TAMODIA, Toulouse (France). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1363686.1363821
Sreedhar, G. (2016). Optimizing Website Content to Improve Correctness of the Website Design Problem Solving and Uncertainty Modeling through Optimization and Soft Computing Applications (pp. 329-338): IGI Global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9885-7.ch015
Stavnycha, M., Yin, H., & Römer, T. (2015). A large-scale survey on the effects of selected development practices on software correctness. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Software and System Process. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2785592.2785617
Welie, M. v., & Traetteberg, H. (2000). Interaction Patterns in User Interfaces. Paper presented at the 7th. Pattern Languages of Programs Conference, Illinois, USA.
Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., Ohlsson, M. C., Regnell, B., & Wesslén, A. (2012). Experimentation in Software Engineering: An Introduction: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29044-2
Yongchareon, S., Liu, C., Zhao, X., Yu, J., Ngamakeur, K., & Xu, J. (2018). Deriving user interface flow models for artifact-centric business processes. Computers in Industry, 96, 66-85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2017.11.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2017.11.001
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
