Clasificación de los tipos de jugadores en la población adulta mayor en sistemas basados en juego
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65234/interaccion.69Palabras clave:
Adultos mayores, Motivaciones, Tipos de jugadores, Sistemas basados en juego, Experiencia de juego, Juegos digitalesResumen
Diferente a lo que se podría pensar, la población mayor tiene una alta participación en los sistemas basados en juego, haciendo uso de juegos que estimulan su cognitividad o su actividad física a través de dispositivos de entrada directa y natural. Aunque principalmente los juegos son orientados a este tipo de estimulaciones y generan una motivación en el adulto mayor, esta no es la única motivación que podría usarse para aumentar el tiempo dedicado a este tipo de experiencias. Actualmente no son aprovechados todas las diferentes motivaciones de esta población debido a que no han sido plenamente identificadas para ser llevados al campo de los sistemas basados en juego. Es por esto que el objetivo de este documento es plantear una caracterización de tipos de jugadores en adultos mayores cuando interactuaran con este tipo de sistemas, basados en diferentes motivaciones que han sido identificadas recientemente. Se espera que esto permita brindar una base por la cual se puedan diseñar experiencias de juego más adecuadas a la población adulta mayor, mejorando así la experiencia del jugador a través de entornos más llamativos y divertidos.
Referencias
Bartle, R. (1996). HEARTS, CLUBS, DIAMONDS, SPADES: PLAYERS WHO SUIT MUDS.
Birk, M. V., Friehs, M. A., & Mandryk, R. L. (2017). Age-based preferences and player experience: A crowdsourced cross-sectional study. CHI PLAY 2017 - Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, November, 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1145/3116595.3116608 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3116595.3116608
Broady, T., Chan, A., & Caputi, P. (2010). Comparison of older and younger adults’ attitudes towards and abilities with computers: Implications for training and learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 473–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00914.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00914.x
Brooke, J. (1995). SUS: A “Quick and Dirty” Usability Scale. In Usability Evaluation In Industry (pp. 207–212). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781498710411-35 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781498710411-35
Brown, J. A. (2017). Digital gaming perceptions among older adult non-gamers. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10298, 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58536-9_18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58536-9_18
Calvert, J. (2018). Office of Financial Management, State Human Resources developed.: RAMP model. Office of Financial Management, State Human Resources developed. https://www.ofm.wa.gov/sites/default/files/public/shr/RAMP Handout.pdf
Carstensen, L. L. (1995). Evidence for a Life-Span Theory of Socioemotional Selectivity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(5), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep11512261 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep11512261
Cota, T. T., Ishitani, L., & Vieira, N. (2015). Mobile game design for the elderly: A study with focus on the motivation to play. Computers in Human Behavior, 51(PA), 96–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.026
De Schutter, B., & Malliet, S. (2014). The older player of digital games: A classification based on perceived need satisfaction. Communications, 39(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2014-0005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2014-0005
De Schutter, B., & Vanden Abeele, V. (2010). Designing meaningful play within the psycho-social context of older adults. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, December, 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1145/1823818.1823827 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1823818.1823827
Devereux-Fitzgerald, A., Powell, R., Dewhurst, A., & French, D. P. (2016). The acceptability of physical activity interventions to older adults: A systematic review and meta-synthesis. Social Science and Medicine, 158, 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.04.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.04.006
Epic-Games. (2006). Gears of War. Microsoft. https://gearsofwar.com/es-es/
Epic-Games. (2020). Fall Guys. https://store.epicgames.com/es-ES/p/fall-guys
Epic-Games. (2021). NBA 2K21. https://store.epicgames.com/es-ES/p/nba-2k21
ESA ‘Entertainment Software Association.’ (2019). 2019 ESSENTIAL FACTS About the Computer and Video Game Industry. https://www.theesa.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/ESA_Essential_facts_2019_final.pdf
Fullerton, T. (2014). Game Design Workshop: A Playcentric approach to creating innovative games. In Game Design Workshop. A K Peters/CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b22309 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b22309
Gerling, K. M., Mandryk, R. L., & Linehan, C. (2015). Long-term use of motion-based video games in care home settings. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 2015-April, 1573–1582. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702125
Guerrilla-Games. (2017). Horizon Zero Dawn. Sony. https://www.playstation.com/es-es/games/horizon-zero-dawn/
Ijsselsteijn, W. A., Kort, D., & Poels, Y. A. W. &. (2013). GAME EXPERIENCE QUESTIONNAIRE. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven. https://research.tue.nl/en/publications/the-game-experience-questionnaire
IJsselsteijn, W., Nap, H. H., De Kort, Y., & Poels, K. (2007). Digital game design for elderly users. Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Future Play, Future Play ’07, January, 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/1328202.1328206 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1328202.1328206
Kari, T. (2020). Exergaming experiences of older adults: A critical incident study. 32nd Bled EConference Humanizing Technology for a Sustainable Society, BLED 2019 - Conference Proceedings, June, 639–654. https://doi.org/10.18690/978-961-286-280-0.34 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18690/978-961-286-280-0.34
Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Engineering, 2, 1051. https://doi.org/10.1145/1134285.1134500 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1134285.1134500
Lankes, M., Hagler, J., Gattringer, F., & Stiglbauer, B. (2017). InterPlayces: Results of an intergenerational games study. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10622 LNCS, 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70111-0_8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70111-0_8
Lazzaro, N. (2004). Why We Play Games: Four Keys to More Emotion Without Story. Player Experience Research and Design for Mass Market Interactive Entertainment. XEODesign. http://xeodesign.com/xeodesign_whyweplaygames.pdf
Manrique, V. (2013). Gamification Player Types: The T-E Pyramid. 1–12. https://www.gamedeveloper.com/design/gamification-player-types-the-time-engagement-pyramid
Marczewski, A. (2013). The Intrinsic Motivation RAMP. Gamified UK. https://www.gamified.uk/gamification-framework/the-intrinsic-motivation-ramp/
Marczewski, A. (2015). User Types. In Even Ninja Monkeys Like to Play: Gamification, Game Thinking and Motivational Design (1st ed., pp. 65–80). CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. https://www.gamified.uk/user-types/#intrinsic
Mojang-Studios. (2021). Minecraft. https://www.minecraft.net/es-es
Nintendo. (2006). Wii Sports Club. https://www.nintendo.es/Juegos/Programas-descargables-Wii-U/Wii-Sports-Club-806816.html
Nintendo. (2017). The Legend of ZeldaTM: Breath of the Wild para la consola Nintendo Switch - Detalles de los juegos de Nintendo. https://www.nintendo.com/es_LA/games/detail/the-legend-of-zelda-breath-of-the-wild-switch/
Peng, W., & Hsieh, G. (2012). The influence of competition, cooperation, and player relationship in a motor performance centered computer game. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(6), 2100–2106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.014
Pink, D. H. (2009). Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us (summary). Distribution, 256. http://book.douban.com/subject/3885056/
Possler, D., Klimmt, C., Schlütz, D., & Walkenbach, J. (2017). A Mature Kind of Fun? Exploring Silver Gamers’ Motivation to Play Casual Games – Results from a Large-Scale Online Survey. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 10298, 280–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58536-9_23 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58536-9_23
Quiñones, D., Rusu, C., & Rusu, V. (2018). A methodology to develop usability/user experience heuristics. Computer Standards and Interfaces, 59(November 2017), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2018.03.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2018.03.002
Razak, F. H. A., Azhar, N. H. C., Adnan, W. A. W., & Nasruddin, Z. A. (2017). Exploring Malay older user motivation to play mobile games. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics): Vol. 10645 LNCS. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70010-6_44 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70010-6_44
Rigby, S., & Ryan, R. (2004). The Player Experience of Need Satisfaction (PENS) An applied model and methodology for understanding key components of the player experience. www.immersyve.com
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.68
Salazar Cardona, J., Gutiérrez Vela, F. L., Lopez Arango, J., & Gallardo, J. (2021). Game-based systems: Towards a new proposal for playability analysis. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 3082, 47–56.
Salazar, J. A., Arango, J., Gutiérrez, F. L., & Moreira, F. (2022). Older Adults and Games from a Perspective of Playability, Game Experience and Pervasive Environments: A Systematics Literature Review. World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies 2022, 444–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04819-7_42 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04819-7_42
Salazar, J., Arango, J., Gutiérrez, F., & Moreira, F. (2022). Meaningful learning : Motivations of older adults in serious games. Universal Access in the Information Society, 28.
Sansone, C., & Harackiewicz, J. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Search for Optimal Motivation and Performance. https://books.google.es/books?hl=es&lr=&id=uM10geBB8o4C&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&ots=DDy5f5A07K&sig=lrAo0SsWIa-yW0hnvNX-I0hKhgc&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Santos, L. H., Okamoto, K., Hiragi, S., Yamamoto, G., Sugiyama, O., Aoyama, T., & Kuroda, T. (2019). Pervasive game design to evaluate social interaction effects on levels of physical activity among older adults. Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering, 6, 205566831984444. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055668319844443 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2055668319844443
Sayago, S., Rosales, A., Righi, V., Ferreira, S. M., Coleman, G. W., & Blat, J. (2016). On the Conceptualization, Design, and Evaluation of Appealing, Meaningful, and Playable Digital Games for Older People. Games and Culture, 11(1–2), 53–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412015597108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412015597108
Seaborn, K., & Fels, D. I. (2015). Gamification in theory and action: A survey. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 74, 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.006
Seah, E. T. W., Kaufman, D., Sauvé, L., & Zhang, F. (2018). Play, Learn, Connect: Older Adults’ Experience With a Multiplayer, Educational, Digital Bingo Game. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(5), 675–700. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117722329 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117722329
Seligman, M. (2018). PERMA and the building blocks of well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(4), 333–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2018.1437466 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2018.1437466
Shao, D., & Lee, I. J. (2020). Acceptance and influencing factors of social virtual reality in the urban elderly. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(22), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229345 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229345
Subramanian, S., Dahl, Y., Skjæret Maroni, N., Vereijken, B., & Svanæs, D. (2020). Assessing Motivational Differences between Young and Older Adults When Playing an Exergame. Games for Health Journal, 9(1), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2019.0082 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2019.0082
Syed-Abdul, S., Malwade, S., Nursetyo, A. A., Sood, M., Bhatia, M., Barsasella, D., Liu, M. F., Chang, C. C., Srinivasan, K., Raja, M., & Li, Y. C. J. (2019). Virtual reality among the elderly: A usefulness and acceptance study from Taiwan. BMC Geriatrics, 19(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1218-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1218-8
Tondello, G. F., Wehbe, R. R., Diamond, L., Busch, M., Marczewski, A., & Nacke, L. E. (2016). The gamification user types Hexad scale. CHI PLAY 2016 - Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1145/2967934.2968082 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2967934.2968082
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 Revista de la Asociación Interacción Persona Ordenador (AIPO)
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
